|
LASER INTERFEROMETER GRAVITATIONAL WAVE OBSERVATORY
LIGO Laboratory / LIGO Scientific Collaboration 
California Institute of Technology LIGO Project – MS 18-34 1200 E. California Blvd. asadena, CA 91125 Phone (626) 395-2129 Fax (626) 304-9834 E-mail: [email protected]
|
a
|
Massachusetts Institute of Technology LIGO Project – NW22-295 185 Albany St Cambridge, MA 02139 Phone (617) 253-4824 Fax (617) 253-7014 E-mail: [email protected]
|
LIGO Hanford Observatory P.O. Box 159 Richland WA 99352 Phone 509-372-8106 Fax 509-372-8137
|
|
LIGO Livingston Observatory P.O. Box 940 Livingston, LA 70754 Phone 225-686-3100 Fax 225-686-7189
|
Distribution of this document: LIGO Scientific Collaboration This is an internal working note of the LIGO Laboratory. http://www.ligo.caltech.edu/ * Analytical Chemistry Laboratory, JPL, Pasadena, Ca ^
Ginzton Laboratory, Stanford
University, CA
Introduction
Mirror surface
contamination can severely degrade the performance of the Advanced LIGO
interferometers.
Particles are a
primary source of contamination that generate scatter and greatly contribute to
the increase of coating absorption. For this reason, the cleanliness of the
mirrors must be carefully controlled throughout the entire interferometer’s
assembly process. We investigated the use of First Contact™,
a strippable film, to protect
and clean the mirror’s
surface.
1 The tests
Two tests were
performed to evaluate possible residual contamination of the polymer film on the mirror’s surface after
stripping.
1.1 Test 1
Test one, done
by Diffuse Reflectance/ Fourier Transform Infrared (DRIFT/FTIR) spectroscopy,
was to determine if molecular residue remained after pealing off the film from
a glass surface.
The test was
performed at JPL’s ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY LABORATORY by Mark Anderson.
Glass test
surfaces were pre-cleaned and tested to a level of less than 0.01 micrograms per square centimetre of molecular
residue. The polymer solution was
painted on to the clean glass and allowed to set for 2 hours. The material was
then pealed off the surface. The surface was sampled using a dichloromethane
swab/rinse. The low volatility residue (LVR) was analyzed using FTIR.
FTIR provides
chemical functional group information for quantitative analysis and qualitative
identification of materials. The analysis followed the ACL-120 procedure that
complies with Mil-STD-1246C Notice 3 and is sensitive to the most stringent
level (A/100).
The glass
surface that was treated with First Contact™ (applied and removed) was found to
be very clean with less than 0.02 micrograms per square centimetre of molecular
residue.
1.2 Test 2
The other test was done to measure optical
absorption on a mirror surface
previously treated with the strippable material.
The optical absorption measurements were performed by Volodymyr Kondilenko and Ashot Markosyan at the Ginzton Labs, Stanford University.
The coating’s optical absorption on
3” dia. mirror was measured at four points (Figure 1) using Photothermal
Common-Path Interferometer (PCI).
The optical absorption results,
in ppm, are shown on the bottom “Before” gray box.
Then, First
Contact™ was poured on the mirror’s surface and spread with a soft brush
without touching the surface. The solution was allowed to cure for several
hours under a laminar flow. The film was stripped and the part was sent back to
Stanford for measurements.
1.3
Results
 Figure 1
After the surface was treated with First Contact™,
measurement points #a2, #b1, #c1, #d1 and #e1
were taken.
(Figure 1)
The absorption
measurement set-up was calibrated and measurements were taken at points pa2,
p2b, p3a, p3b, p3c, 4pa, 4pb, p1m2a (not shown in Figure 1), with measurement results indicated on the upper left table of “Results”; the location
of these points was as close as possible to the area of the ones measured Before
surface treatment. Measurements at points m2 and m4 were taken
for the sole purpose of checking results before and after calibration.
2
Conclusions
We can conclude that after treatment of a surface with First
Contact™ 1. There was not detrimental molecular residue left on the treated
surface
2.
The absorption measurements before and after the surface
treatment are within the
instruments’ error, hence, there was not increase in absorption.
3.
The application of First Contact™,
on a previously cleaned coated,
surface is a suitable way to prevent contamination on mirror’s
surfaces throughout the assembly process of the Advanced LIGO interferometer.
Tests remain to be done on larger surfaces to assess if the film can be stripped
without breaking.
LMA, in Lyon, will conduct
independent tests on this material. Their results will be published at a later
date.
As further information, there is a paper: “Test of Opticlean strip coating material
for removing surface contamination” by Jean M. Bennett and Daniel Rönnow, published on APPLIED OPTICS, 1 June 2000/Vol. 39, No. 16 that states and demonstrates that “... no residue that produced scattering was found
on a fresh silicon wafer when Opticlean was applied and then stripped off”.
Since then, Opticlean changed its name to First Contact™.
|